Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus Details: NCBI 1585, low G+C gram-positive [subspecies]

| "Thermobacterium bulgaricum" Orla-Jensen 1919| ATCC 11842| CCUG 41390| CIP 101027| DSM 20081| IFO 13953| JCM 1002| Lactobacillus bulgaricus| Lactobacillus bulgaricus (Orla-Jensen 1919) Rogosa and Hansen 1971 (Approved Lists 1980)| Lactobacillus delbrueckii (SUBSP. BULGARICUS)| Lactobacillus delbrueckii bulgaricus| Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus| Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus (Orla-Jensen 1919) Weiss et al. 1984| Lactobacillus sp. NCIM 2056| LMG 13551| LMG 6901| LMG:13551| LMG:6901| NBRC 13953| NCTC 12712| Thermobacterium bulgaricum| VKM B-1923

A lot more information is available when you are logged in and raise the display level

Other Sources for more information:

More Information
Statistics NCBI Data Punk End Products Produced

Lab Reporting

Different labs use different software to read the sample. See this post for more details.
One lab may say you have none, another may say you have a lot! - This may be solely due to the software they are using to estimate.
We deem lab specific values using values from the KM method for each specific lab to be the most reliable.

Desired Levels Suggestions for Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus

These are values that are computed from lab specific samples (Patent Pending)
LabFrequencyUD-LowUD-HighKM LowKM HighLab LowLab HighMean MedianStandard DeviationBox Plot LowBox Plot High KM Percentile Low KM Percentile High
Other Labs 0.26 10 1152 0 1196 332 210 440.8 10 1152 12.5 %ile 75 %ile
thorne 31.03 2 405 0 328 72 19 130.8 2 405 9.1 %ile 81.8 %ile

External Reference Ranges for Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus

Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus (NCBI 1585) per million
Source of Ranges Low Boundary High Boundary Low Boundary %age High Boundary %age
XenoGene 600 1000 0.06 0.1
Statistic by Lab Source for Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus
These desired values are reported from the lab reports
Lab Frequency Seen Average Standard Deviation Sample Count Lab Samples
CosmosId 9.375 %   0.064 %  0.044 % 3.0 32
custom 14.754 %   0.003 %  0.001 % 9.0 61
es-xenogene 20.69 %   0.003 %  0 % 6.0 29
Thorne 17.308 %   0.007 %  0.01 % 18.0 104

To see medical conditions associated you may be logged in

And display level must be raised above public.

I would like to know what can change the quality that I have

Data Contradictions β€” Limits of Certainity

To get the list of studies, you must be logged in and raise your display level.

πŸ§™? Search Hints:
General Substance Specific Substance Effect
Diet Style high-fat diets 1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Decreases📓, Click for details.
Diet Style magnesium-deficient diet 1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Decreases📓, Click for details.
Drug or "Non-drug" glyphosphate 1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Decreases📓, Click for details.
flavonoids, polyphenols etc resveratrol (grape seed/polyphenols/red wine) 1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Increases📓, Click for details.
Food (excluding seasonings) almonds/ almond skins 1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Increases📓, Click for details.
Food (excluding seasonings) laminaria digitata,oarweed - seaweed 1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Increases📓, Click for details.
Food (excluding seasonings) laminaria hyperborea( tangle/cuvie - seaweed) 1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Decreases📓, Click for details.
Food (excluding seasonings) navy bean 1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Increases📓, Click for details.
Food (excluding seasonings) sesame cake/meal 1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Increases📓, Click for details.
Herb or Spice daesiho-tang 1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Increases📓, Click for details.
Prebiotics and similar Human milk oligosaccharides (prebiotic, Holigos, Stachyose) 1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Increases📓, Click for details.
Prescription - Other chemotherapy (prescription) 1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Decreases📓, Click for details.
Prescription - Other proton-pump inhibitors (prescription) 1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Increases📓, Click for details.
Probiotics enterococcus faecium (probiotic) 1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Decreases📓, Click for details.
Sugar and similar raffinose(sugar beet) 1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Increases📓, Click for details.
Sugar and similar stevia 1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Decreases📓, Click for details.
Sugar and similar sucralose 1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Decreases📓, Click for details.
Vitamins, Minerals and similar magnesium 1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Increases📓, Click for details.

This is an Academic site. It generates theoretical models of what may benefit a specific microbiome results.

Explanations/Info/Descriptions are influenced by Large Language Models and may not be accurate and include some hallucinations. Please report any to us for correction.

Copyright 2016-2024 Lassesen Consulting, LLC [2007], DBA, Microbiome Prescription. All rights served.
Permission to data scrap or reverse engineer is explicitly denied to all users. U.S. Code Title 18 PART I CHAPTER 47 Β§β€―1030, CETS No.185, CFAA
Use of data on this site is prohibited except under written license. There is no charge for individual personal use. Use for any commercial applications or research requires a written license.
Caveat emptor: Analysis and suggestions are based on modelling (and thus infererence) based on studies. The data sources are usually given for those that wish to consider alternative inferences. theories and models.
Inventions/Methodologies on this site are Patent Pending.

Microbiome Prescription do not make any representations that data or analyses available on this site is suitable for human diagnostic purposes, for informing treatment decisions, or for any other purposes and accept no responsibility or liability whatsoever for such use.
This site is not Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) compliant.